Football Betting - Football Results - Free Bets
Updated: 10/06/24 legal disclaimer
Acca Boost


Betting Against the Market

Football-Data's revenues come from losses accrued by customers of advertised bookmakers. Nearly all bettors lose in the long run. Users taking advantage of any advertised welcome offer should familiarise themselves with the bookmaker's T&Cs. Any information appearing on this website, including references to winning, profit, beating odds/bookmakers etc. should not be considered professional advice or a recommendation to bet or gamble. Furthermore, the small proportion of customers considered by bookmakers to be sufficiently skilled at beating their prices may find their stakes restricted or have their accounts closed. Both the UK Government and bookmakers alike maintain that betting and gambling in the UK should be considered a form of entertainment only and not a trade to make money. Please gamble responsibly. NEVER risk what you cannot affort to lose. GambleAware.

In 2016 I published my book Squares & Sharps, Suckers & Sharks: Science, Psychology & Philosophy of Gambling in which I described a potentially profitable betting that adopted a so-called contrarian approach (betting against the market). Testing it retropsectively over the period 2005/06 to 2014/15 on European football league matches could have returned a profit of £60,000 from 15,000 level stakes of £100 each (although odds availabiliity, staking limits and other bookmaker restrictions would have had a significant influence on achieving this return).

The betting method exploits a market inefficiency that arises as a result of bettors behaving in sub-optimal ways. By betting against that irrationality, the method has revealed an apparently consistent, if weak, profitbaility.

The method is fully described in my new book (see below), page 114, Exploiting the Hot Hand Fallacy.

In my new book, Squares & Sharps, Suckers & Sharks: Science, Psychology & Philosophy of Gambling, I explore the science of probability and uncertainty, the difference between expectation and utility, bettors' irrationality and how we might exploit it for a profit in football, luck & skill, market efficiency and the wisdom of crowds, why winners take all and why indeed we gamble at all.

From: Amazon | Google | Waterstones | High Stakes.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

I have written a 10-page PDF describing the method. The material is essentially taken from my book. From December 2016 until November 2018 I had been charging a fee for this, but have now decided to offer it for free. Obviously I would rather you purchased my book since there is a whole lot of other information in there which I think you will find benefical to your betting, but the choice is yours.

I have also published a slight variant of the method on Pinnacle.

And I have now re-tested the method with a new set of data from 16 extra European and worldwide football leagues which replicate the original findings.

Although the profitbability is small, it is available at Pinnacle closing prices. This is important, because Pinnacle, unlike other bookmakers, will not restrict you for using strategies that exhibit postive expected value.

As for any betting method, Football-Data cannot guarantee that the methodology described will continue to allow the reader to make a profit by following the advice contained within. There is always the possibility that what you think you might have found is nothing but luck. Furthermore, where you may have found something real and profitable (and more than just luck), future exploitation of such a method can see its advantage disappear. Nor is this a recommendation to bet or gamble. Those who gamble do so at their own risk. Never risk what you cannot afford to lose. If you do, please gamble responsibly.